Method and apparatus for enabling a computer system

ABSTRACT

A system and method for utilizing generic computer operating system software for computer hardware systems designed subsequent to the operating system software. The system and method of the present invention employs a separate modular software file called a System Enabler that has all patches, code, data and resources needed to make a particular computer system operational. The System Enabler file is matched to a particular hardware system and may be bundled with that hardware system. During computer system start up the System Enabler file modifies the generic operating system software for optimum operation with the particular computer hardware system.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This patent application is related to U.S. Ser. No. ______ filedconcurrently herewith, for a “A Method and Apparatus for OverridingResource Maps in a Computer System” by Dean Yu and Chris Derossi,attorney docket number 2827-38027(P946), which is hereby incorporated byreference.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

The following documents are herein incorporated by reference: Inside theMacintosh, Volume IV, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc. (1987);and Apple Macintosh Family Hardware Reference, Addison-Wesley PublishingCompany, Inc. (1988).

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

This invention relates generally to computer operating systems bootsequence and initialization methods and apparatus.

2. Summary of the Related Technology

System Software as it's developed today is tied very closely with theparticular Macintosh machines that it supports. In some cases, thismakes a lot of sense since the system software has to interface with thehardware. In other cases, though, this is an artificial limitation. Forexample, System 6.0.5 doesn't support the Macintosh Classic because theClassic was released after System 6.0.5. However, since the Classic isso similar to previous machines, namely the Macintosh SE, System 6.0.5would work just fine if it weren't for the check made by the boot codethat prevents it from loading.

Frequently there will be changes to the hardware which require changesto the system software. In many cases, the changes needed in the systemsoftware are minor compared to the task of developing and releasing anentirely new version. But, in the past, there was no way to provideincremental changes without releasing a whole new version of systemsoftware. Thus, each new set of machines required a complete andseparate software development effort.

Hardware support releases of system software are released later, andhave higher versions number than the version on which the release wasbased. Customers perceive that the hardware support version is superiorbecause it has a higher version number. Customers then want the newerversion, even if they do not have one of the new machines that requirethe new software. Exacerbating the matter is the fact that hardwaresupport releases often supply additional functionality, causingdevelopers and customers to want the new release for all machines.Hardware support features are required by new machines, thus newsoftware releases are required to implement small human interfaceelements. For example, System 6.0.5 could not ship with Classic because“About the Finder . . . ” would have called it a Macintosh SE and givenit the wrong icon.

In the past, operating systems were developed with a particularprocessor and hardware environment in mind. System designers tailoredthe operating system to run on a particular processor and hardwareconfiguration. While it has been considered good programming designmethodology to take advantage of the underlying hardware architecture,the operating system was limited to the particular processor andhardware environment for which it was written. The operating systemswere not portable. This was so because the operating system software hadto interface with and control the computer system hardware. Althoughsuch operating systems may have operated satisfactorily on oneparticular type of processor, they would not run on another type ofprocessor. As a result, prior operating systems were inflexible.

In the past, an entirely new version of the operating system softwareusually had to be developed for each new type machine. An individualdevelopment effort was required to code and release a new version of theoperating system whenever a new processor or hardware configurationchange was implemented. Such development efforts were usually veryexpensive and time consuming.

In order for the operating system to accommodate different hardwareenvironments, system designers were usually forced to release a newversion of the operating system when new hardware platforms becameavailable. Many times, it did not take long for the latest version of anoperating system to be upstaged by a newer version generated toaccommodate a new hardware configuration. As an undesirable result ofthis, different versions of the same operating systems wouldproliferate.

Even in the absence of new hardware platforms using new matchingdesigns, there were other changes in hardware that required changes tothe system software. In many cases, the changes to the hardware wererelatively minor compared to the task of developing and releasing anentirely new version of the operating system software. Nevertheless,these ad hoc efforts at system design negatively impacted engineeringresources, quality control, marketing, and profitability. Theproliferation of different versions of an operating system createdsignificant difficulties for those attending to version control anddocumentation. The problems normally encountered in debugging softwareand beta testing were greatly exacerbated by the proliferation ofdifferent versions of operating system software.

In the past, attempts have been made to extend the functionality of anoperating system software release by patching or implementing newfunctions. Theses functionally extensible patch files were sometimesreferred to as “extensions.” For example, to add new functionality thatallows an application program to play movies within a document, anattempt might be made to extend the system software functionality withan extension file. Extensions were sometimes referred to as “INIT”files, because of their file type in the Macintosh computer environmentprovided by Apple Computer, Inc. Extension files were patch files thatrelied on the system boot routine to bring up the system from a power onreset state to a fully operational state.

Patch files contained changes to system software that were called in andexecuted to augment system software after system initialization by theboot routine. These patch files would change code in the operatingsystem to accommodate new machines, new hardware configurations, and toupdate system software in order to fix problems or add functionalityafter the release of an particular version of an operating system.

In addition to the above described problems, application programs thatwere written to run on a particular hardware platform might not run onlater versions of the hardware, because the application program mightnot be compatible with the new version of the operating system requiredfor a new hardware configuration different from that on which theapplication program was originally designed to run.

Further problems were created because the way that system programmersdealt with the inherent incompatibility between most underlying hardwarearchitecture's sometimes had the undesirable result of imposingartificial imitations on the software. Typically, a status check of thehardware configuration would be performed by the operating system duringthe system start-up, or boot procedure. Oftentimes, an operating systemdesigned to run on a first hardware platform would be prevented fromloading onto a second slightly different platform, when the status checkdetermined that the hardware platform was not the one that the operatingsystem expected. The system would halt, even though the operating systemmight be capable of actually running on that slightly different hardwareplatform. Thus, the artificial barrier created by the common practice ofperforming such status checks would make operating systems that weredesigned to run on a particular hardware platform incompatible with anydifferent hardware platform, regardless of the similarities between thetwo hardware platforms. Nevertheless, such status checks were oftenconsidered to be a necessity in order to prevent computer systemcrashes, because of the lack of portability between most hardwareplatforms.

Customers were often confused when numerous ad hoc versions of systemsoftware appeared on the market with higher version number than the onethe customer had just purchased. Customers typically perceived softwarehaving a higher version number to be superior over software with a lowerversion number, even though the difference in version was only toaccommodate hardware which the customer did not utilize. This practicealso tended to raise customer concerns as to why frequent softwarerevisions were being released.

The system software vendor must test its latest released version ofoperating system software with all existing computer hardware, past andpresent. Of course, as the number of different hardware systemsincreases, so does the requirement for software testing of new systemsoftware versions.

It is apparent from the above discussion of problems in conventionalsystems, that there is a need for an improved method and apparatus toaccommodate new computer hardware developments with an existing softwareoperating system.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates generally to the concept of using modularizedsoftware with new computer systems and more particularly to a techniquethat employs a separate modular software file having all patches, code,data and resources needed to initialize a particular computer system.

The present inventors have developed new operating system architecturesthat are designed to solve these problems. Portions of the boot orstart-up routine have been moved out of read only memory (ROM) and intofiles so that the boot routine is no longer hard coded and inflexible.As much of the boot procedure as possible is located in a file on diskinstead of ROM so that the boot procedure can be changed by providing anew boot procedure file on disk.

The present invention provides a method and apparatus for updatingexisting computer operating system software so that the existing versionof the system software will operate with and utilize new functionalitiesand developments in computer operating system and the underlyingcomputer hardware architecture. The method and apparatus of the presentinvention utilizes software modules, referred to as a “System Enabler”or “Gibbly”, which is specific to a particular computer system'simplementation in hardware and software. Whenever a new computer systemis introduced, the correct new version of a software module is alsoincluded with the computer system. The operating system software of thepresent invention utilizes a separate file which contains all of thepatches, code, data and resources needed to utilize specific newhardware. This file is called the “System Enabler” or “Gibbly”.

By removing the hardware specific knowledge from the operating systemsoftware, a new version of the operating system software is not requiredevery time new hardware is utilized in a computer system. Instead, thepresent invention allows the most recent generic version of a softwareoperating system to be utilized with subsequently introduced computerhardware systems by supplying the appropriate System Enabler with thenew computer system.

The present invention reduces the number of new versions of operatingsystem software required to support new computer system hardware. Thepresent invention permits hardware specific changes to be made to theoperating system software early in the boot process.

A feature of the present invention is the ability to boot new hardwareimplementations developed subsequently to the current operating systemsoftware. Another feature of the present invention is use of the mostrecent time stamped Gibbly, or some other selection criteria such asmachine state, operating mode, or other criteria to select the mostappropriate Gibbly for starting up the computer system.

Other and further features and advantages will be apparent from thefollowing description of a presently preferred embodiment of theinvention, given for the purpose of disclosure and taken in conjunctionwith the accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of a computer system in accordancewith the present invention; and

FIGS. 2-4 are flow charts in accordance with the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

A better understanding of the present invention will be obtained whenthe following detailed description is read with reference to thedrawings where common elements are designated with like numbers orletters and similar elements are designated with like numbers or lettersfollowed by a lower case letter. The system and method of the presentinvention utilizes a generic software operating system to be used withsubsequently released computer systems using newly designed hardware.

Overview of Preferred Embodiment

A computer system comprises a processor, random access memory (RAM),read only memory (ROM), nonvolatile memory storage devices (hard disk)and user input-output interfaces (keyboard and video display).Nonvolatile memory is used to store software programs, for example, theoperating system and application program. The ROM stores instructionsthat cause the processor to run system diagnostic tests then transferprogram information stored in the nonvolatile memory to RAM. Once theoperating system and other required software resources have beentransferred to RAM, the processor begins executing the instructionsstored in the RAM.

Preferably, as the computer system hardware begins initialization in thepower-on reset or user initiated mode, the hardware start up process,common referred to as a boot routine, the generic software operatingsystem searches for the current System Enabler or Gibbly that isprogrammed to boot the corresponding specific hardware system. Normally,a computer system starts the operating system boot sequence frominstructions located in its ROM. The ROM resident instructions directthe processor of the computer system to continue booting frominstructions located in boot code in the RAM associated with thecomputer hardware. These boot instructions located in RAM may then callthe appropriate System Enabler or Gibbly to complete the correct bootprogram for the specific hardware system. Thus the boot routine can beupdated by providing a new System Enabler or Gibbly file to be executedby the boot routine during system initialization.

The specific software mechanism of the System Enabler may be calledhereinafter a “Gibbly”. A Gibbly may be thought of as a program that iscapable of booting one or more machines. The system software selects themost appropriate Gibbly and allows the selected Gibbly to boot thecomputer system.

A summary of the preferred embodiment of the present invention will bedescribed for an Apple (R) Macintosh (R) computer system. A morecomplete description of the Macintosh computer hardware and softwaresystems is illustrated in “Inside Macintosh” by Apple Computer, Inc.,Addison-Wesley Publishing Company (2d Ed. 1992) and incorporated hereinby reference for all purposes.

In the preferred embodiment, the Gibbly of the present invention mayexist in the System file, in the computer system ROM, or in a separatefile in the System Folder. The Gibbly preferably resides in the SystemFolder for booting up the computer system. The preferred Gibbly containsa resource which specifies which computer systems the Gibbly is capableof booting. Preferably, the Gibbly also has a time stamp which allowsthe system software of the present invention to utilize the Gibbly withthe most recent time-date stamp for booting purposes if more than oneGibbly is present. The appropriate Gibbly selection process may be basedupon criteria other than the time-date stamp. The Gibbly may containother selection criteria comprising machine state, operating mode,preference file, or other criteria describing the machine, its hardware,or the preferred initial operating state.

In the preferred embodiment, the operating system software is generic inthat the same system software may be utilized with a general class ofpast, present, and future computer systems. Preferably, there is enoughcommonalty in the general class or family of computer systems so thatthe general functionality of the generic system software does notmaterially change between members of the class. Specific enhancements innew computer system software and hardware, however, may be outside ofthe general class and may require special purposed programs to fullyutilize the enhanced features of the new hardware.

The present invention utilizes existing and proven operating systemsoftware and modifies it or adds special instructions to take bestadvantage of new hardware developments and architectures as they becomeintegrated into new computer systems added to the general class ofcomputer systems to which a generic operating system applies. Theimproved method and apparatus of the present invention utilizes a SystemEnabler or Gibbly that contains the hardware specific instructions foreach type of computer system in the general class. The generic softwareoperating system passes control to the System Enabler or Gibbly duringsystem start up or boot so that the hardware specific instructions maybe implemented.

The Gibbly of the present invention contains a list of computer systemsthat it has knowledge of, and also, the Gibbly includes a time-datestamp. The list of computer systems allows the Gibbly to act on computersystems for which the Gibbly was designed. The time-date stamp allowsthe resident operating system program to select the most recent Gibbly.Gibblies may reside in the computer system ROM, with the operatingsystem in the system file, or exist as separate programs introduced asnew Gibbly files distributed after both the computer system hardware andoperating system software are installed and operational.

In the preferred embodiment, the operating system selects the mostappropriate Gibbly based on the most recent time-date stamped Gibblythat has knowledge of the particular maching that the operating systemis trying to boot. The maching may be located on a network and a Gibblymay be associated with other machines on the network. Because the Gibblyoperates each time the computer system starts up, new Gibblies, havingenhanced features, may be added subsequent to existing installedGibblies. More than one Gibbly may exist in the computer system ROM,operating system software, or added resource file, but only the latesttime-date stamped Gibbly will be utilized during system start up, thus,insuring that the latest hardware implementations are utilized.

The Gibbly mechanism is designed to solve the problems encountered withpast systems as discussed above. The present invention reduces theeffort required to support new machines, by allowing incremental changesto the system software to be performed outside of the base systemsoftware. Thus only the incremental changes require additionaldevelopment and testing. The incremental changes required for newmachines do not execute on older machines, thus system developers do nothave to test an incremental change to system software on the oldersystems that do not utilize the change. Instead, developers canconcentrate on testing the new software with the new machines.

The present invention provides an improved method and apparatus thatsupports changes to low-level system software. In order for the Gibblymechanism to be successful, it supports the kinds of changes that arerequired by new hardware. The existing extension (INIT) mechanism willnot work because it doesn't allow low-level changes to be applied earlyenough in the boot process. The present invention reduces the amount ofeffort required to support new computer system hardware by allowingincremental changes specific to the new hardware be added to theoperating system software without having to modify or retest theunderlying generic operating system software.

The Gibbly architecture leverages off of resource overrides described inthe patent application entitled A Method and Apparatus for OverridingResource Maps in a Computer System, filed concurrently herewith. Theresource override architecture is one of the foundational architecturesfor the Gibblies.

In the preferred embodiment, after a power-on reset or a user initiatedreset, the system boot process initializes the computer system to itsproper initial operating state. The initial operating state will dependon the available peripherals and central processing unit. A Gibbly mayexist in the system file, in ROM, or as a separate file from the systemfile. The system boot file will determine whether to continue bootingwith the remainder of the boot file contained in the system file oranother file, or to go to an external Gibbly to continue the bootprocess.

The initial portion of the boot procedure is contained in ROM, afterwhich the ROM routine reads in the remainder of the boot code from disk.The Gibbly will install additional patches and features that thespecific machine will require. A specific Gibbly is customized to boot aparticular machine or set of machines. The Gibbly allows the system toboot or initialize and work properly.

In the preferred embodiment, the earliest stages of the boot process arecarried out by the ROM in the Macintosh. As soon as possible, the bootprocess is handed over the system software on disk. Since the systemsoftware was created more recently, it is assumed to have more knowledgeabout what needs to be done. Gibblies takes this idea one step further.

A Gibbly is an entity that knows how to boot one or more machines. Bydefault, there's a Gibbly in the System itself which knows how to bootthe particular machine and other machines similar to it. Instead ofalways taking the boot process upon itself, as is done today, the Systemwill locate the most recent Gibbly and allow it to boot the Macintosh.The concept is the same as with the ROM and system software, the mostrecent Gibbly code has more knowledge about what needs to be done.

Booting with Gibblies

A Gibbly may exist in one of three places: the System file itself, theROM, or in a separate file in the System Folder for flexibility. AGibbly may be placed in ROM to complete a boot process in ROM. TheGibbly may exist in the system file, in which the entire file containsenough information to boot the machine. There may be also a systemenabler file, the Gibbly, shipped with new machines. Thus when newversions of the system software are released, the functionalitycontained in the separate file can be combined into a single file in thesystem file. The system file can then boot the machine and will notrequire a system enabler file to boot the machine.

Thus, a new Gibbly will supersede the old Gibbly and thus maintain theentirety of the boot procedure in a single location. To facilitatehardware delivery schedules, new machines can be shipped with separateGibblies capable of booting the machine. Then as developers addfunctionality to the system software, the new Gibblies will be developedand shipped which are capable of booting machines that were shippedafter the original Gibblies. Thus, these new Gibblies will supersedethose Gibblies that were first shipped with the machines.

With the new Gibbly in place, the older system software is updated tocontain all the new functionalities developed after shipping the oldersystem software. The new Gibbly brings the older system software to thefunctional level of the newer system software without the need for a newversion release.

Preferably, the Gibbly files exist in the System Folder because they arerequired files for booting. Preferably, as soon as the system softwareon disk takes over the boot process, it searches for all Gibblies thatcan boot the machine. Each Gibbly contains an identifier which specifieswhich computers, for example which Macintoshes in the preferredembodiment, that Gibbly is capable of booting. The Gibbly has anassociated time-date stamp. If the system software locates more than oneGibbly that can boot the machine, the system selects the Gibbly with themost recent time stamp to take over the boot process. As discussedabove, the appropriate Gibbly may be selected based on other criteria ora combiniation of criteria existing in the Gibbly.

Preferably, a Gibbly with a later time-date stamp is capable ofreplacing all prior Gibblies for a particular machine. Prefereably, thiswill not require maintaining a substantial amount of historicalinformation in the Gibbly. Gibblies will take over the boot processwithout needing any information from older superseded Gibblies.Preferably, System file Gibblies will be able to boot completely ontheir own. Non-System Gibblies will preferably be compatible with onlyone previous version of the system software.

For example, a future scenario will preferably occur as follows:

-   -   Jan. 1, 1995 System 9.0 released    -   Feb. 1, 1995 Macintosh IV releases with a new ROM. The ROM        Gibbly boots the Mac using resources from itself and from System        9.0.    -   Mar. 1, 1995 Macintosh Classic III releases with an older ROM.        Since there's no ROM Gibbly, a Gibbly file is provided. The        Gibbly file boots the Macintosh using resources from itself and        from System 9.0.    -   Jul. 1, 1995 System 9.1 releases. It has a later time-date stamp        than either the Mac IV ROM Gibbly or the Classic III file        Gibbly, so it boots the Macs, but has incorporated the changes        from both Gibblies, so the system software does not need        anything but itself to boot. Non-System Gibblies are no longer        required for either of these machines.

If the user attempts to boot a machine with a recent Gibbly and oldsystem software, the Gibbly has the option of either dealing with theolder system and performing the boot, or telling the user to get thelatest version of the System software.

Gibblies should not be considered merely as a new extension mechanism.Gibblies do more than extend the system software by patching the oldsystem software. Gibblies actually perform the boot process withoutpatching the old boot process. Gibblies supersede the older boot processin addition to implementing patches, to correct problems and provide newfunctionality. Moreover, only one Gibbly will be executed at boot time,and so the Gibbly itself performs the boot process in addition toproviding new functionality, thus the Gibbly is more than an extensionor patch, it is a self-contained boot routine that initializes thesystem from its initial power-on reset state to the presentation statewhere the system presents the greeting to the user and is ready toaccept commands from the system user. In the preferred embodiment, theMacintosh environment, the Gibbly brings the system up to the “Finder”.The Finder is the Macintosh application that allows a user to manipulateand organize files on disk.

In the past, extensions were provided by INIT files. The boot processwas responsible for loading these files and executing the code in thesefiles. The Gibbly also loads and executes files to patch code andprovide new functionality. In the preferred embodiment, the Gibblypreferably knows how to boot the system in addition to loading andexecuting patch files.

The following table illustrates where each part of the boot process mayreside. Location of Boot Stage Code Executed by Diagnostics ROM ROM BootBlocks Disk System Boot System Arbitration ‘boot’ 2 System, ROM, or MainBoot ‘boot’ 3 Gibbly

Patching with Gibblies

The majority of the differences between a machine-specific release ofSystem Software and a reference release of System Software exist in thepatches that are needed to get a new machine to boot.

In the preferred embodiment, the system software implements newfunctionality and corrects problems through patches. Each patch routinehas an identification number associated with it. Every patch may notapply to a given machine, thus a patch table is provided to instruct theGibbly which patches not to install for the particular machine. Forexample, if a patch applies only to a color monitor, a machine with amonochrome monitor would not need to install the color patch. Thus, thecolor patch would appear in the patch table for the monochrome machineand would not be installed by the Gibbly. Preferably, the size of Gibblyfiles is minimized.

The key to turning patches on and off is the patch load table. The tablespecifies ranges of patches to load from a particular set of patches.For each patch entry, the patch loader will see if it is in any of theranges specified in the patch load table. If it is, it will be maderesident in memory and executed. If the entry is not in any of thespecified ranges, it will not be loaded or executed.

This mechanism allows a Gibbly to pick and choose which patches toinstall and in which order. For example, it can load some patches fromthe base system, then load some more from it's own set of patches, thengo back to loading more patches from the system file if it really wantedto. A Gibbly might want to do this if some patches in the System thatdidn't change for a new machine relied on patches that did change butare loaded before the first set of patches.

Resident Resources

Gibblies preferably add or replace resources. The best example is the‘STR#’-16395 resource which contains a list of the names of all shippingMacintoshes. Chances are, this resource in the base system will not havethe name of new machines. Gibblies for these machines will want toreplace this resource with a new one that contains the name of the newmachine.

ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT OF THE INVENTION

In the drawings the number 140 designates generally a computer system. Arepresentative hardware environment for the present invention isdepicted in FIG. 1 which illustrates a suitable hardware configurationof a computer system 140 in accordance with the present invention.

The computer system 140 has a central processing unit 110, such as aconventional microprocessor, and a number of other devicesinterconnected via a computer system bus 112. The computer system 140comprises a random access memory 114 (RAM), a read only memory 116(ROM), an I/O adapter 118 for connecting peripheral devices such asnonvolatile memory devices such as disk units 120 to the bus 112, a userinterface adapter 122 for connecting a keyboard 124, a mouse 126, aspeaker 128, a microphone 132, and/or other user interface devices (notillustrated) to the bus 112. The computer system 140 may also have acommunications adapter 134 for connecting the bus 112 to a dataprocessing network 130 and a display adapter 136 for converting thedisplay information from the bus 112 to video information to drive adisplay device 138.

Referring now to FIGS. 2-4, flow charts of the present invention areschematically illustrated. When the computer system 140 is initiallystarted by turning power on or during a system reset, a hardwarediagnostic test is run on the entire computer system 140 from programinstructions located in the ROM 116. Function block 200 illustrates thisdiagnostic test. Upon successful completion of the hardware diagnostictests, subsequent instruction in the ROM 116 cause the processor 110 totransfer operating system software and system enabler files from harddisk 120 to the RAM 114. This transfer is illustrated by function block202.

Once the software files are transferred from the disk 120, the programresiding in the ROM 116 transfers control to the operating systemsoftware now in the RAM 114. This transfer of program control isillustrated in function block 204. One of the first things that theoperating system software does is cause the processor 110 to look forthe most appropriate system enabler file that is compatible with thehardware of the computer system 140. This is illustrated by functionblock 206.

When the most compatible system enabler is located, the operating systemsoftware gives up its control of the processor 110. As illustrated infunction block 300 and decision block 302, the enabler file must becompatible with the hardware of the system 140.

There may be more than on System Enabler file or Gibbly present in thecomputer system 140. A Gibbly may be programmed into the ROM 116 at timeof manufacture of the computer system 140. A Gibbly may be part of theoperating system software by incorporating the Gibbly at the time ofsoftware manufacture, or the Gibbly may be a separately loaded resourcefile added subsequent to both the hardware and operating system softwarereleases.

Thus, there may be more than one Gibbly present in a computer system 140and its RAM 114 or ROM 116. The present invention searches for allGiblies that can start up (boot) the hardware of the computer system140. The Gibbly has a resource which specifies which computer system 140the Gibbly may start up. The Gibbly also has other data such as atime-date stamp, on which a compatibility determination may be made,thus, the operating system resource manager may easily determine themost appropriate Gibbly to utilize in starting up the computer system140 by using, for example, the latest time-date stamped Gibbly havingthe correct resource ID.

Once the correct Gibbly is selected by the operating system software,the selected Gibbly takes over control of the processor 110 of thecomputer system 140. After control is with the selected Gibbly, theGibbly will modify the operating system software and any other softwarethe Gibbly is programmed to modify. This step is illustrated in functionblock 304. The Gibbly modifies the appropriate software for bestcompatibility with the host computer system 140 so that maximum use ismade of any new hardware or software technology designed subsequent tothe generic operating system software.

Once the selected Gibbly finishes the boot process it launches theprocess manger. New Gibblies may be added at any time during the life ofthe computer system. For example, when a new harware upgrade isincorporated into the computer system 140 a new Gibbly supporting thehardware upgrade can be installed into the system folder file. The newhardware upgrade used in conjunction with the existing computer system140 and operating system software will be accommodated whenever thecomputer system is once again initialized, as illustrated in FIG. 2,block 200.

While the invention has been described in terms of a preferredembodiment in a specific system environment, those skilled in the artrecognize that the invention can be practiced, with modification, inother and different hardware and software environments within the spiritand scope of the appended claims.

1. A computer system including operating system software configurablefor controlling different computer hardware, comprising: (a) aprocessor; (b) at least one storage device; (c) a software operatingsystem operable in a plurality of different computer hardwareconfigurations, the software operating system having modifiable systeminitialization information stored in the at least one storage device;and (d) a system enabler containing information for configuring thesoftware operating system for a computer hardware configuration.
 2. Thecomputing system according to claim 1, wherein the system enabler isstored in a nonvolatile read-write memory storage device.
 3. Thecomputing system according to claim 1, wherein the system enabler isstored in a read only memory.
 4. The computing system according to claim1, wherein the system enabler includes selectable software patches andresources.
 5. The computing system according to claim 1, includingprocessor means for transferring the software operating system andsystem enabler from a storage device to a random access memory.
 6. Thecomputing system according to claim 1, including a plurality of systemenablers containing date and hardware compatibility information.
 7. Thecomputing system according to claim 6, wherein the software operatingsystem utilizes a particular system enabler.
 8. A method for modifying ageneric software operating system to control a plurality of computerhardware systems, comprising the steps of: (a) storing a softwareoperating system and a computer hardware system enabler on a storagedevice; (b) transferring the software operating system and systemenabler from the storage device; and (c) modifying the softwareoperating system, with information from the system enabler file, toadapt the software operating system for operation on a computer hardwaresystem.
 9. The method of claim 8, including the steps of: (a) storing aplurality of system enablers containing computer hardware compatibilityinformation and selection criteria in computer system nonvolatileread-write memory; and (b) selecting from said plurality of systemenablers a system enabler file having compatible informationcorresponding to a computer hardware configuration.
 10. A method forproviding a computer system, including operating system software,configurable with a system enabler to control different computers,comprising the steps of: (a) selecting a system enabler; and (b)configuring the operating system software to control a computer hardwareconfiguration using the selected system enabler.
 11. The method of claim10 wherein the system enabler is stored in a nonvolatile read-writememory device.
 12. The method of claim 10 wherein the system enabler isstored in a read only memory.
 13. The method of claim 10 wherein thesystem enabler includes selectable software patches and resources. 14.The method of claim 10, including the step of transferring the operatingsystem software and system enabler from a storage device to a randomaccess memory.
 15. The method of claim 10, including the step ofproviding a plurality of system enablers having selection criteria andhardware compatibility information.
 16. The method of claim 15 whereinthe software operating system utilizes the system enabler with a mostrecent date-time stamp.
 17. The method of claim 10 wherein the systemenabler contains information corresponding to a machine state.
 18. Themethod of claim 17 wherein the software operating system utilizes thesystem enabler with a most recent date-time stamp.
 19. The method ofclaim 10 wherein the system enabler contains information correspondingto selection criteria.
 20. The method of claim 19 wherein the softwareoperating system utilizes the system enabler with a most appropriateselection criteria.